S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 Surge into Resistance Ahead of FOMC Meeting
September seasonality may be terrible, but this week was fantastic: The Nasdaq 100 (/NQU4) had its best week of the year, while the S&P 500 (/ESU4) and Russell 2000 (/RTYU4) clocked their second best weeks of 2042.
Each of /ESU4, /NQU4, and /RTYU4 are nearing resistance in symmetrical triangles, suggesting breakouts from multi-month consolidations may loom.
The September seasonality gets more severe moving forward, however: Sept. 17 to 30 is the worst part of the worst month of the year.
September has brought the usual promise of elevated volatility and rollercoasters for U.S. equity markets. Two-way action has been acute: the S&P 500 (/ESU4) was down 4.86% for the month at one point, only to rally back to a more modest loss of 0.56% in September thus far.
The turnaround last week was dramatic. Not only did the S&P 500 register its second-best week of the year, so too did the Russell 2000 (/RTYU4). They were both bested by the Nasdaq 100 (/NQU4), whose performance last week takes the pole position on the leaderboard for best weekly performance of 2024.
Technical structures in place at the end of August, which appeared to be increasingly bullish, have been stress-tested over the past two weeks. By and large, equity indexes have survived those tests. Yet we’re not out of the woods just yet. Keeping September’s shocking seasonality in mind, it’s worth noting the worst part of the worst month of the year is just around the corner, starting tomorrow and continuing to Sept. 30. During this window, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) will meet, and its possible the federal government will shut down.
Bullish breakouts may indeed be around the corner, as symmetrical triangles typically have bullish resolutions. But as was noted heading into September, “it stands to reason that traders may look upon the improved technical structures and decimation in volatility with skepticism” and instead use the opportunity to reduce the beta-weighted delta of their portfolios, either by taking profit on short volatility/long equity positions or buying cheaper out-of-the-money (OTM) puts as protection for what the second half of September may bring.
While the S&P 500 (/ESU4) may not be far removed from where it was at the start of September, the technical structure has evolved. At the start of the month, /ESU4 was trading above the trendline from the October 2023 and July 2024 lows; midway through the month, it is now below it. Likewise, the descending trendline from the July and August swing highs has yet to be breached, nor have the late-August highs; there is meaningful technical resistance immediately overhead.
The momentum profile has improved, nevertheless. /ESU4 is trading above its daily five-EMA (exponential moving average), daily 21-EMA and daily 34-EMA: T he EMAs are in bullish sequential order. Slow stochastics are trending higher through their median line, and MACD is trending higher through its signal line, having just issued a buy signal. Volatility has contracted (IVR: 20.1) after the early-month jump, but the VIX remains above 15.
From a technical standpoint, if /ESU4 were to break above 5670, it would appear that an inverse head and shoulders pattern, or a symmetrical triangle, breakout would be in the cards. The measured move higher, depending upon measurement points, would call for /ESU4 to trade above 6100, and perhaps as high as 6300, into the end of the year. If the breakout were to transpire alongside a drop in the VIX below 15, it would be suitable to express bullishness through ATM (at-the-money) calls (or call spreads).
Failure to scale above 5670 would mean that consolidation remains, and a return to FOMC meeting on Wednesday, given the contraction in volatility, one way to express the view that /ESU4 won’t break out this week but will ultimately trade higher is to deploy a short put calendar around the Sept. 30 and Oct. 31 expiries.
The technical outlook for the Nasdaq 100 (/NQU4) is remarkably similar to that of /ESU4: the momentum profile is effectively identical, and a symmetrical appears to have been forming in recent months. The strategic approach thus remains the same with respect to trading ATM calls (or call spreads) in the event of a bullish breakout, as well as it does for potentially preparing for a weaker market around the Fed with short put calendars. In clearing the Sept. 3 high, /NQU4 would break the bearish engulfing bar that marked the monthly high and set up a return to the Aug. 22 bearish key reversal candlestick high at 20025.25.
Do you like broken records? If so, the Russell 2000 (/RTYU4) outlook may sound familiar: /RTYU4 is in a symmetrical like /ESU4 and /NQU4, and it is trading up to triangle resistance. The weekly close in /RTYU4 above the 38.2% Fibonacci retracement of the April low/July high trading range alongside a drop in volatility (IVR: 34.3) makes iron condors wrapped around the six-month trading range less appealing. Similarly, it’s not appealing to trade bullish breakout conditions yet because the consolidation remains. That said, if /RTYU4 does break out, it may be ready to go through a period of catchup to its mega cap brethren. The Fed rate hike cycle may have hurt smaller companies more than bigger companies, but it would stand to reason it may help smaller companies moving forward.
Christopher Vecchio, CFA, tastylive’s head of futures and forex, has been trading for nearly 20 years. He has consulted with multinational firms on FX hedging and lectured at Duke Law School on FX derivatives. Vecchio searches for high-convexity opportunities at the crossroads of macroeconomics and global politics. He hosts Futures Power Hour Monday-Friday and Let Me Explain on Tuesdays, and co-hosts Overtime, Monday-Thursday. @cvecchiofx
For live daily programming, market news and commentary, visit tastylive or the YouTube channels tastylive (for options traders), and tastyliveTrending for stocks, futures, forex & macro.
Trade with a better broker, open a tastytrade account today. tastylive, Inc. and tastytrade, Inc. are separate but affiliated companies.
Options involve risk and are not suitable for all investors. Please read Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options before deciding to invest in options.